Why do we have to do this distinction between nominal and real GDP? The answer is that real GDP is much more accurate metric in terms of measuring a country’s material wellbeing than that of nominal GDP (NGDP) because real GDP (RGDP) is adjusted for inflation or deflation.
In other words, real GDP refers to domestic production of final goods and services valued at constant prices whereas nominal GDP means domestic production of final goods and services valued at current prices.
Imagine an economy that produces only two types of dates, Ajwa and Anbara dates, nothing else.
Let’s call this country Dateland. And assume that Dateland uses Saudi Riyal (SAR) as its currency. Dateland Statistical Agency (DSA) publishes the historical data for production and prices shown in Table 1:
Year | Price of Ajwa (per kilogram) | Quantity of Ajwa dates (In kilograms) | Price of Anbara (per kilogram) | Quantity of Anbara dates (In kilograms) |
2019 | 8 SAR | 900 | 3 SAR | 3 SAR |
2020 | 4 SAR | 1,200 | 5 SAR | 1,100 |
2021 | 6 SAR | 1,000 | 5 SAR | 1500 |
From the data in Table 1 we can easily calculate nominal GDP of Dateland at a given year by
multiplying the market price of each type of date with its quantity and then adding them together shown in Table 2:
Table 2
Year | Calculation | Nominal GDP |
2019 | 8 SAR x 900 kg Ajwa dates + 3 SAR x 1,200 kg Anbara dates | = SAR 10,800 |
2020 | 4 SAR x 1,200 kg Ajwa dates + 5 SAR x 1,100 kg Anbara dates | = SAR 10,300 |
2021 | 6 SAR x 1,000 kg Ajwa dates + 5 SAR x 1,500 kg Anbara dates | = SAR 13,500 |
To calculate the real GDP, we need to choose a base year.
The base year should be a representative year in that the country in that year must not experience any abnormal occurrences such as famines, floods, devastating earthquakes, disruptive political upheavals, major economic downturns and so on – no calamity year is the base year.
Let’s assume that 2020 is one of those representative years in Dateland’s short economic history. Hence, we take 2020 as the base year for Dateland. Now using 2020 prices of Ajwa and Anbara dates, we can calculate real GDP of Dateland for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 as shown in Table 3.
Year | Calculation | Real GDP |
2019 | 4 SAR x 900 kg Ajwa dates + 5 SAR x 1,200 kg Anbara dates | SAR 9,600 |
2020 | 4 SAR x 1,200 kg Ajwa dates + 5 SAR x 1,100 kg Anbara dates | SAR 10,300 |
2021 | 4 SAR x 1,000 kg Ajwa dates + 5 SAR x 1,500 kg Anbara dates | SAR 11,500 |
Lesson learned – the base year’s real GDP is always equal to its nominal GDP. Furthermore, in nominal terms 2019 seems a better year than that of 2020 (NGDP of SAR 10,800 in 2019 versus NGDP of SAR 10,300 in 2020) but not in real terms (RGDP of SAR 9,600 in 2019 versus RGDP of SAR 10,300 in 2020).
If we assume that people’s material wellbeing is the only factor that makes them happy (a very strong assumption!), then we can argue that in 2020 Dateland people were much happier than 2020 because the real GDP of the country in 2020 was higher than that of 2019.
However, among these three years, the happiest year for Dateland citizens was 2021 because in that year Dateland generated the highest real GDP (Table 3).
However, we should still be very watchful about media’s use of the word GDP because usually it is impossible to distinguish whether the author means real or nominal GDP.
One of the ways for capturing inflating (or deflating) effects of prices on GDP is to calculate GDP deflator for each year
using the following formula:
GDP deflator is a metric of the average (or aggregate or general) price level calculated as the ratio of nominal GDP to real GDP multiplied by 100.
Year | Nominal GDP | Real GDP | GDP Deflator |
2019 | SAR 10,800 | SAR 9,600 | |
2020 | SAR 10,300 | SAR 10,300 | |
2021 | SAR 13,500 | SAR 11,500 |
Now it is time to calculate inflation measured by GDP deflator. Yes! There are many other ways to measure inflation such as Consumer Price Index (CPI), which we will mention when we talk about inflation in detail later.
Since here inflation is a percentage change of GDP deflator from one year to another, we will have inflation rates for years 2020 and 2021 not year 2019 because we do not have 2018 data. Table 5 shows how we calculate inflation rates based on GDP deflator for years 2020 and 2021.
However, you should keep in mind that inflation (or deflation) measured based on GDP deflator does not reflect correct inflation metric because GDP excludes goods and services imported by the country.
Table 5
Year | GDP Deflator | Inflation = % Change in GDP Deflator |
---|---|---|
2019 | 112.5 | |
2020 | 100.0 | |
2021 | 117.4 |
Table 6
Year | Rate of Change (%) of Nominal GDP | Rate of Change (%) of real GDP | Inflation=Rate of Change (%) of GDP Deflator |
2020 | -11.11% | ||
2021 | 17.40% |
Once again, economically meaningful information is conveyed by real variables such as real GDP, real interest rates, real exchange rate and so on, which we will be discussed later.
Thus, economic agents, from consumers to businesspeople to policymakers, make their decisions based on real variables not nominal variables, otherwise they end up making mistakes.
Applying real GDP per capita formula to these countries we have created Table 7 reporting 2021 per capita real GDP of them.
Table 7
Country | Real GDP 2021 | Population 2021 | Real GDP per Capita 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
Dateland | SAR 11,500 | 100 | |
Jujubeland | SAR 23,000 | 1000 |
Using The Following Formula:
What we see in Table 7 is that even though Jujubeland had a higher real GDP in 2021 than that of Dateland, average Dateland person was materially richer than that of average Jujubeland person.
We keep repeating that real GDP, more precisely, real GDP per capita is a metric for material wellbeing for an average person. Remember, by definition, real GDP is real income of the people of the country under consideration. Unless the real income is distributed perfectly equally, for Dateland, an average real income of SAR 115 in 2021 does not mean that every Dateland citizen earned real income of SAR 115 in 2021.
Per capita real GDP is a metric for material wellbeing but not overall wellbeing. For example, if Jujubeland citizens, on average, had more leisure time in 2021 than those of Dateland citizens in the same year, then Jujubelanders were better off relative to Datelanders – but per capital real GDP does not take this happiness factor into account. Jujubelanders might have produced many goods and services that were not exchanged in markets such as growing their own vegetables andfruits for their own consumption. Real GDP does not take this into account.
Dateland might havebeen experiencing significantly more environmental degradation than that of Jujubeland. Real GDP does not take this into account. Income distribution might be much better in Jujubeland than that of Dateland. Real GDP per capita does not take this into account. There might be fewer criminal activities in Jujubeland than that of Dateland. Real GDP per capita does not take this into account.